End Times is a philosophical idea and Martin Luther realised it's full moment when he re-read Romans 3 – The Just shall live by faith. This statement likewise coveys an ultimate conclusion, there is both life and death.
Well-Being Australia chairman, Mark Tronson, a retired Baptist minister says that the words, "End Times" is central to Christian theology in taking God at His Word as revealed to us in the Bible for the "not yet" has a yearning in the heart of man.
What can be said is that one in twenty five verses in the New Testament have some engagement with End Times and associated themes, and therefore it should come as no surprise to anyone that this subject (Eschatology) would create some interest.
There are three essential philosophical themes within End Times.
First, The Scriptures are replete with a clear understanding that Jesus Christ will return. There will be a Second Coming of Jesus Christ. He rose from the dead and He is coming again.
Moreover, it should come as no surprise, that this is recognised only by the followers of Christ. In other words, the vast majority of the world's population is simply unaware that the Scriptures speak of this.
Second, not all followers of Christ are as conversant with the Scriptures as others. There has been a limited number of Bible lovers over the centuries who have carefully studied the 'like' passages of End Times who have tried to bring some resolution to the subject.
Thirdly, as these passionate 'End Times' Bible lovers have put their energies into this quest, there have emerged two very broad schools of thought, and like most things of this nature, there are variations in each broad school.
One of these two broad schools demonstrate a philosophy of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ that says, there will be a decisive time when history as we know will come to and end. It is instantaneously precipitated by the Second Coming of Jesus Christ. Like the movies – The End!
The other broad school demonstrates a philosophy that witnesses the end of the Church Age which leads into a final time period taking into account Scriptures that speak of 'one taken, another left', of such 'tribulation' the world has never thought possible, an 'Armageddon', armies of 'two hundred million', blood up to the 'horses bridle', and much more besides.
In other words, the first group takes a view that the Bible's descriptiveness of the End Times necessarily needs to be apocalyptic in order to even begin to fathom the unfathomable.
The second group take a view that the Bible wasn't written so no one could understand it, rather the very basis of the Reformation was that ordinary men and women could read and understand it. Moreover End Times takes such centre stage in the New Testament, any obscurity on such matters seems ludicrous.
So, can there be a case for 'agreeing to disagree' on End Times or is there something more, some other ingredient, that might be taken into consideration.
Mark Tronson says that a central focus of Jesus' teaching was the Kingdom of God. The central focus of the Apostle Paul's and the Epistles teaching was the theology of the Cross, which helps us understand that becoming followers of Jesus is a life saving decision.
In other words, Evangelism is a central focus. He's noticed that even in his own life time, where a descriptive expression of the End Times is lucid and passionate, what follows is an unmistakable desire for men and women to philosophically fall at the foot of the Cross and become followers of Jesus.
In other words, when End Times is preached in such manner, the Holy Spirit strangely prompts the hearts of the hearers. "I have been a witness to this over my 59 years, as have innumerable others," observes Mark Tronson.
"Further, when End Times is preached in a clear and descriptive manner, so the Holy Spirit somehow is able to minister within many of the lives of the hearers. To this, I am a testimony and an eye witness."