Here is a great truth - the accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That's what happened in Europe seven years ago. It could happen in Australia.
A little aired story illustrates this to a tee. It relates to the 'Swiss handshaking dispute'. It appears as though it was deemed too inconsequential a matter to bother much of the world's media, but the BBC picked it up. There's an old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: "Many a little makes a mickle."
It's the story of incrementation. It relates 'one victory' for the side of sanity. There will need to be a great many more.
The challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and customs of the indigenes (Nation States, ie France, Germany, Belgium ...) have no logical end - and will not stop. And the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the stronger and more frequent their challenges will be.
They are attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of numbers from both migration and by outbreeding the Infidels, to fashion not a parallel society but one society — and that dominated by Muslim [sharia].
The Swiss story
Sometimes it's the little things that are most telling. In Switzerland it has long been customary for students to shake the hands of their teachers at the beginning - and - end of the school day. It's a sign of solidarity and mutual respect between teacher and pupil, one that is thought to encourage the right classroom atmosphere.
Justice Minister Simonetta Sommaruga recently felt compelled to further explain that shaking hands was part of Swiss culture and daily life. And the reason she felt compelled to speak out about the handshake is that two Muslim brothers, aged 14 and 15, who have lived in Switzerland for several years (and thus are familiar with its mores), in the town of Therwil, near Basel, refused to shake the hands of their teacher.
The teacher was a woman, because, they claimed, this would violate Muslim teachings that contact with the opposite sex is allowed only with family members. At first the school authorities decided to avoid trouble, and initially granted the boys an exemption from having to shake the hand of any female teacher.
But an uproar followed, as Mayor Reto Wolf explained to the BBC: "the community was unhappy with the decision taken by the school. In our culture and in our way of communication a handshake is normal and sends out respect for the other person, and this has to be brought [home] to the children in school."
Therwil's Educational Department reversed the school's decision, explaining in a statement on May 25 that the school's exemption was lifted (reversed) because "the public interest with respect to equality between men and women and the integration of foreigners significantly outweighs the freedom of religion."
It added that a teacher has the right to demand a handshake. Furthermore, if the students refused to shake hands again "the sanctions called for by law will be applied," which included a possible fine of up to $5,000.
Now we're learning of other Swiss decisions along the same line across the nation.
Philosophically understood
This uproar in Switzerland, where many people were enraged at the original exemption granted by the school to the Muslim boys - did not end - after that exemption was itself overturned by the local Educational Department.
The Swiss understood quite clearly that this was more than a little quarrel over handshakes; it was a fight over whether the Swiss would be masters in their own house, or whether they would be forced to yield, by the granting of special treatment, to the Islamic view of the proper relations between the sexes.
It is one battle – small - but to the Swiss significant – between o'er weening Muslim immigrants and the indigenous Swiss.
Naturally, once the exemption was withdrawn, all hell broke loose among Muslims in Switzerland. The Islamic Central Council of Switzerland, instead of yielding quietly to the Swiss decision to uphold the handshaking custom, criticised the ruling in hysterical terms, claiming that the enforcement of the handshaking is "totalitarian" because its intent is to "forbid religious people from meeting their obligations to God."
That, of course, was never the "intent" of the long-standing handshaking custom, which was a nearly-universal custom in Switzerland, and in schools had to do only with encouraging the right classroom atmosphere of mutual respect between instructor and pupil, of which the handshake was one aspect.
The Swiss formulation of the problem – weighing competing claims — will be familiar to, say Australians well versed in the High Court's Constitutional adjudications.
In this case "the public interest with respect to equality" of the sexes and the "integration of foreigners" (who are expected to adopt Swiss ways, not force the Swiss to exempt them from some of those ways) were weighed against the "religious obligations to God" of Muslims, and the former interests found to outweigh the latter.
Intergrate?
What this case shows is that even at the smallest and seemingly inconsequential level, Muslims are challenging the laws and customs of the Infidels among whom they have been allowed to settle [i.e., stealth jihad toward sharia dominance]. Each little victory, or defeat, will determine whether Muslims will truly integrate into a Western society or, instead, refashion that society to meet Muslim requirements.
The handshake has been upheld and, what's more, a stiff fine now will be imposed on those who continue to refuse to shake hands with a female teacher. This is a heartening sign of non-surrender by the Swiss.
But the challenges of the Muslims within Europe to the laws and customs of the indigenes have no logical end and will not stop. And the greater the number of Muslims allowed to settle in Europe, the stronger and more frequent their challenges will be.
They are attempting not to integrate, but rather to create, for now, a second, parallel society, and eventually, through sheer force of numbers from both migration and by outbreeding the Infidels, to fashion not a parallel society but one society — then dominated by Muslim [sharia].
Issues that might appear to be too inconsequential a matter to bother with can be very far reaching.
But the Swiss knew better. And so should we in Australia. That old Scottish saying that in one variant reads: "Many a little makes a mickle" illustrates incrementation to a tee.
That is, the accumulation of many little things leads to one big thing. That's what's happening in Europe. Australia must be eternally vigilant in this same area.